From Astoria to Lexington 'Guy
I can not resist posting this video I made showing how to take the train from Astoria going to Manhattan crochet blanket ... this time I left the warnings that train employees are doing, and they can know that we are in a W train, which is the train parador following along Broadway. The other option would be the N train, which is also expressed along Broadway. They are the only two trains that go to Astoria.
Note that always before the doors close you hear "Stand clear of the closing doors", which is a registered crochet blanket trademark of the subway crochet blanket in New York. After living there for any length of time you get used to hear that a trocentas times a day. Each train carries, excluding the driver, a person whose only function is to keep saying it and pressing a button crochet blanket that closes the doors. This must be one of the most absurdly boring jobs in the world, so often or warning is completely incomprehensible (type "stancleafthecoldors") or the subject goes in the opposite direction and begins to be creative, the type sing the phrase, or say it as if it were something spectacular, or some other bizarre way. New York things. (In this video it is unfortunately just said a standard completamenta way.) In newer trains notice is given by a recording, but the subject is still there controlling the ports. Even when the doors are fully automatic, which already could imagine (and even perhaps should) be long, probably the subjects still exist, sitting on a train the corner and feeling crochet blanket heroically indispensable, courtesy of the union of the subway.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 12th, 2008 at 9:47 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. 9 Responses to "From Astoria to Lexington"
Is it that bad? Why then the employee not sought another job? It seems a ridiculously easy job for anyone who wants a buck without much effort. These people exist and will continue to exist and seeking relatively easy jobs. If exchange support with the union of the subway, since this post were extinct seek another easy to use and other protective indefinitely, or worse, instead of standing on the train, they would be at home watching TV to the Social Security costs and things type. At least they are employed, and actually do something for the salary, even if it is little.
What's wrong with respecting individual choices? Who are you to tell the subject that your job does not pay and that should not exist? He's fooling anyone? Lying? Stealing? Cheating? Taking advantage? You are standing just announcing the door. Oh, horror ... What picuinha, Biasi!
Because basically you're saying that I should respect their choice to do what they want while I have to pay for it? In this case, it seems that individual freedom being disrespected is mine. If they want to be riding a train and singing, congratulations, have every right, but do not view as a * right * to be rewarded or paid for it. There are already enough people entering the wagons with guitar trying to beg. These at least in general do not see the contributions as required. But of course, this requires a little more initiative.
So consider the following issue that touches you (though not in those words): what to do with people who do not have initiative, will or competence to provide for their own needs? And this is without doubt one of the most fundamental issues in the organization of a society. There is a much greater agreement on the issue related crochet blanket to what to do with people who circumstantially are in difficulties but who are willing to work hard to overcome them. There is also considerable agreement on what to do with those who are unproductive for lack of choice - for example, who has a serious health problem. But what to do with the chronically unprofitable by choice? Those who could clearly be doing something more useful, but it will always choose life more poorly useless possible?
I personally think they should be allowed to choose this life, but simultaneously also think that they should not expect any reward or payment for it. Anyone who wants to help them help. But I see no moral obligation to do so.
This issue becomes particularly complex because there are people who unbelievably, even having the ability to produce their own support, preferring to let die of starvation before taking the initiative to actually do it. What to do in such cases?
Finally, a note about how you put the question in your last paragraph. For me, "Respect the escolhar i
I can not resist posting this video I made showing how to take the train from Astoria going to Manhattan crochet blanket ... this time I left the warnings that train employees are doing, and they can know that we are in a W train, which is the train parador following along Broadway. The other option would be the N train, which is also expressed along Broadway. They are the only two trains that go to Astoria.
Note that always before the doors close you hear "Stand clear of the closing doors", which is a registered crochet blanket trademark of the subway crochet blanket in New York. After living there for any length of time you get used to hear that a trocentas times a day. Each train carries, excluding the driver, a person whose only function is to keep saying it and pressing a button crochet blanket that closes the doors. This must be one of the most absurdly boring jobs in the world, so often or warning is completely incomprehensible (type "stancleafthecoldors") or the subject goes in the opposite direction and begins to be creative, the type sing the phrase, or say it as if it were something spectacular, or some other bizarre way. New York things. (In this video it is unfortunately just said a standard completamenta way.) In newer trains notice is given by a recording, but the subject is still there controlling the ports. Even when the doors are fully automatic, which already could imagine (and even perhaps should) be long, probably the subjects still exist, sitting on a train the corner and feeling crochet blanket heroically indispensable, courtesy of the union of the subway.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 12th, 2008 at 9:47 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. 9 Responses to "From Astoria to Lexington"
Is it that bad? Why then the employee not sought another job? It seems a ridiculously easy job for anyone who wants a buck without much effort. These people exist and will continue to exist and seeking relatively easy jobs. If exchange support with the union of the subway, since this post were extinct seek another easy to use and other protective indefinitely, or worse, instead of standing on the train, they would be at home watching TV to the Social Security costs and things type. At least they are employed, and actually do something for the salary, even if it is little.
What's wrong with respecting individual choices? Who are you to tell the subject that your job does not pay and that should not exist? He's fooling anyone? Lying? Stealing? Cheating? Taking advantage? You are standing just announcing the door. Oh, horror ... What picuinha, Biasi!
Because basically you're saying that I should respect their choice to do what they want while I have to pay for it? In this case, it seems that individual freedom being disrespected is mine. If they want to be riding a train and singing, congratulations, have every right, but do not view as a * right * to be rewarded or paid for it. There are already enough people entering the wagons with guitar trying to beg. These at least in general do not see the contributions as required. But of course, this requires a little more initiative.
So consider the following issue that touches you (though not in those words): what to do with people who do not have initiative, will or competence to provide for their own needs? And this is without doubt one of the most fundamental issues in the organization of a society. There is a much greater agreement on the issue related crochet blanket to what to do with people who circumstantially are in difficulties but who are willing to work hard to overcome them. There is also considerable agreement on what to do with those who are unproductive for lack of choice - for example, who has a serious health problem. But what to do with the chronically unprofitable by choice? Those who could clearly be doing something more useful, but it will always choose life more poorly useless possible?
I personally think they should be allowed to choose this life, but simultaneously also think that they should not expect any reward or payment for it. Anyone who wants to help them help. But I see no moral obligation to do so.
This issue becomes particularly complex because there are people who unbelievably, even having the ability to produce their own support, preferring to let die of starvation before taking the initiative to actually do it. What to do in such cases?
Finally, a note about how you put the question in your last paragraph. For me, "Respect the escolhar i
No comments:
Post a Comment